Maternal and neonatal outcomes of in-water and out-of-water births in low-obstetric-risk labour: a retrospective observational study at Piacenza hospital.
Barra laterale dell'articolo
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The utilisation of birth pool immersion during labour and delivery constitutes one of the primary non-pharmacological methods for alleviating pain. Consequently, an increasing number of women are opting to employ aquatic environments as a means of managing the childbirth experience. However, the literature reports conflicting data and poor-quality evidence on maternal and neonatal outcomes. It becomes important to understand whether water birth is safe for both woman and baby. The objective of this research is to evaluate and compare neonatal outcomes, including infections, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and Apgar scores at one and five minutes, alongside maternal outcomes such as vagino-perineal lacerations, postpartum haemorrhage, the duration of labour and the expulsive phase, as well as infections, between water birth and non-water birth scenarios.
METHODS
A retrospective observational cohort study employing a parallel design was undertaken. A total of 698 women with low-risk obstetric pregnancies were included and stratified into two groups based on the type of delivery. Data analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software, applying both descriptive and inferential statistical methods to assess the study variables. A logistic model was created for the study population to identify which variables may contribute to an increased likelihood of injury to the perineum.
RESULTS
The research sample comprised 698 deliveries, which were evenly distributed between the two cohorts. The groups exhibited homogeneity concerning maternal age, parity, administration of antibiotic treatment during labour, and positivity rates of vaginal-rectal swabs. A further notable discrepancy (p<0.05) was observed in the volume of postpartum blood loss; however, the difference was minimal in both cohorts. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for each 1 cm increase in infant head circumference, the risk of perineal injury increased by 1.3 times (OR = 1.27; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
The study identified no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes between water and non-water births. Consequently, it appears both suitable and prudent to permit women experiencing low-risk obstetric labour the autonomy to decide whether to deliver in a water-based setting or not. However, further studies are needed. Despite the findings presented, it is crucial to emphasise that further investigation and analysis are absolutely necessary.
Downloads
Dettagli dell'articolo
Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
Riferimenti bibliografici
[1] Garland D, Jones. Waterbirths: supporting practice with clinical audit. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2000;10(3):333-6.
[2] Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD000111.
[3] Maude RM, Foureur MJ. It's beyond water: Stories of women's experience of using water for labour and birth. Women & Birth 2007; 20(1): 17-24.
[4] Carlsson T, Ulfsdottir H. Waterbirth in low-risk pregnancy: an exploration of women's experiences. J Adv Nurs 2020; 76(5): 1221-1231.
[5] Reviriego-Rodrigo E, Ibargoyen-Roteta N et all. Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 29;23(1):395.
[6] Henderson J, Burns EE et all. Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014;14:17.
[7] Ulfsdottir H, Saltvedt S, Georgsson S. Women's experiences of waterbirth compared with conventional uncomplicated births. Midwifery. 2019;79:1-7.
[8] Bailey JM, Zielinski RE et all. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2019;00:1-7.
[9] Jacoby S, Becker G et all. Water Birth Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Midwifery Clients in Alberta, Canada, from 2014 to 2017: A Retrospective Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41(6):805 -812.
[10] Hodgson ZG, Comfort LR, Albert AAY. Water Birth and Perinatal Outcomes in British Columbia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Feb;42(2):150-155.
[11] Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A et all. Outcomes of waterbirth in a US hospital-based midwifery practice: a retrospective cohort study of water immersion during labor and birth. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2020; 65(2): 216-223.
[12] Sidebottom AC, Vacquier M et all. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:707-15.
[13] Seed E, Kearney L, Weaver E, Ryan EG, Nugent R. A prospective cohort study comparing neonatal outcomes of waterbirth and land birth in an Australian tertiary maternity unit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Feb;63(1):59-65.
[14] Committee on Obstetric Practice, American Academy of Pediatrics. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 594: Immersion in water during labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):912-915.
[15] American college of obstetricians and gynecologists' committee on obstetric practice. Committee Opinion No. 679. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e231-e236.
[16] McKinney JA, Vilchez G et all. Water birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S961-S979.e33.
[17] Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management: Handbook for the Training of Health Care Professionals - Ministry of Health Department of Quality - Directorate General for Health Planning, Levels of Care and System Ethics; Office III.
[18] Maternity Care Working Party. Making normal birth a reality. Consensus statement from the Maternity Care Working Party: our shared views about the need to recognise, facilitate and audit normal birth. 2007 [cited 2011 March 7]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/JointStatmentNormalBirth2007.pdf.
[19] Legislative Decree No. 47 of 24 February 1997 'Implementation of Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices'. Ordinary Suppl. G. U. No. 54, 6 March 1997.
[20] Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Guidelines for risk assessment and risk management for water safety in internal distribution systems in priority and non-priority buildings and in certain ships under Directive (EU) 2020/2184. Edited by the Ad-hoc Working Group on Water Safety in Indoor Water Distribution Systems in Buildings and Certain Ships 2022, 177 p. ISTISAN Reports 22/32.
[21] Deans AC, Steer PJ. Labour and birth in water. Temperature of pool is important. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):390-1.
[22] ISS-SNLG Postpartum haemorrhage: how to prevent it, how to treat it. Guideline 26. October 2020.
[23] ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol, July 2016 Vol 128, 1-15 Issue I.
[24] World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Human Beings. Evidence 2013;5(10):e1000059.
[25] Vanderlaan J, Hall P. Systematic Review of Case Reports of Poor Neonatal Outcomes With Water Immersion During Labor and Birth. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 2020; 34(4):p 311-323.
[26] Kubeczková L, Kučerová DJ et all. In water or on land? Evaluation of perinatal and neonatal outcomes of water births in low-risk women. Ceska Gynekol. 2021;86(5):311-317.
[27] Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Caughey AB. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births. BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):950-958.
[28] Taliento Cristina, Tormen Mara et all. Impact of waterbirth on postpartum hemorrhage, genital trauma, retained placenta and shoulder dystocia: A systematic review and meta-analysis, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2022;10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.016, 276, (26-37).
[29] Burns E, Feeley C, Hall PJ, Vanderlaan J. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e056517. Erratum in: BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 27;12(9):e056517corr1.