Revenge, Plasticity and Imagination

Autori

  • Kristupas Sabolius Vilnius University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/12032

Abstract

This paper investigates revenge through the interplay of plasticity and imagination. Drawing on C. Malabou’s theory, plasticity encapsulates the capacity to receive and bestow form, emphasizing the dual forces of creation and destruction in transformation. This suggests that revenge, often seen as a fixation on the past, can be countered by Nietzsche’s concept of active forgetting as a strategy to break cycles of repetition. As a result, Malabou’s plasticity aligns with G. Simondon’s idea of imagination’s transitional potential, challenging postmodern skepticism about facts by viewing their ontology through imagination’s transformative work. To explore these considerations, I juxtapose John Wojtowicz’s bank robbery and its cinematic adaptation, Dog Day Afternoon, with Vladimir Putin’s historical manipulations, framing both as efforts to reconstitute true events. This study examines how cultural industries and historical manipulations trap narratives in cycles of schematism. Additionally, I propose my sound work, blending historiography and autobiography to uncover overlooked aspects of history, such as the role of women. Finally, the investigation of revenge through plasticity and imagination, along with the exemplary studies, suggests that imagination can serve as a tool for justice, moving beyond revenge toward creative transformation.

Biografia autore

Kristupas Sabolius, Vilnius University

Principal Investigator at the (Post) Authoritarian Landscapes Research Centre and Professor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University. His recent publications include The Theory of Milieu: Philosophy, Environmentalism, Education (2025, ed.), Immaginazione. Al di là dell’Antropocene (2024), and On the Real (2021, ed.).

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2025-06-05

Come citare

Sabolius, K. (2025). Revenge, Plasticity and Imagination. Philosophy Kitchen - Rivista Di Filosofia Contemporanea, (22), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/12032